Dissemination/Valorisation

14-April-2005

Jenny`s reminder about the need to record all relevant dissemination/valorisation activities is timely.
Thanks Jenny for reminding us of the need to keep a careful record of dissemination and for indicating the kind of activities that would count, including distribution of the publicity leaflet, presentations and Newsletters etc. It reminded me that we had included an article on the EGCRF in our latest CeGS Newsletter, together with articles on the NGRF and the NLRG. Should any of our partners wish to read more, the link to the PDF version of the Newsletter is given above. (Pages 4 and 5 refer.) Deirdre

Deirdre Hughes; 14-April-2005 17:02:43 forum (0)

Monitoring call - April, 2005

12-April-2005

The bi-monthly monitoring call from the UK Leonardo National Office
I was reminded that dissemination/valorisation activities are often a 'weak area' of Leonardo projects and advised to ask all partners to keep careful records of every type of activity that could count.

jenny bimrose; 12-April-2005 19:46:20 forum (0)

Title for the national section?

15-April-2005

[ Blogging ]
A proposal from the national focus group in Finland
Dear colleagues, We had the first meeting of our national focus group on Tuesday, April 12th. We discussed about the goals and content of the project. As a whole the meeting was productive. We discussed about the target group of the site and also the title of the national site. The members mentioned that the title National guidance research forum might be a threshold for the users. If we are emphasising the dialogue between research and practice, could we express this focus already in the title; for example "From guidance research to guidance practice". What do you think about this? Does this give impression of a top-down approach and does not take into account the dimension from practice to research? Would there be another option to frase it like this: The national guidance research & practise forum? Another question was focusing on the concept "Supporting innovative guidance and counselling" What do we mean by this. Is this project and knowledge extraction the innovative element or are we searching and collecting innovative practices for peer learning purposes? Looking forward to your comments, Merja & Raimo

Raimo Vuorinen; 15-April-2005 13:59:38 forum (4)

4 comments.

Latest comment:
25-May-2005 21:51 by pepl; Top down?